~Paul Brown~Lt. General Robert Van Antwerp, Chief of the US Army Corps of Engineers would not answer my question "Should New Orleans be abandoned?"
But the General, whose job it is to protect New Orleans from future hurricanes, did admit he could not save the city from storm surges. "Protect the city no, reduce the risk yes. We can develop better early warning systems, better evacuation plans, better levees to hold back most of the water but we cannot stop levees being overtopped and the city flooded."
~Editilla calls an Ignorant Twerp, Antwerp~
Again it seems it seems the Corps here is setting us up for the let-down. {Protect the city no, reduce the risk yes.}
WTF does that Mean? Isn't that a contradiction? Simple Question:
How to simultaneously Reduce Risk by Not Protecting the City?
We just know that with each News Cycle lately, the Corps seems to be begging-off future responsibility for maintaining their current work. Well, we beg to know then: What the Fuck is the Corps of Engineers Good For If They Can't Do Their Job?
This man who is Now Shirking His Duty is basically telling any future investment to give up on New Orleans. He is telling the Citizens of New Orleans to Give Up on their Future.
This Bad Commander is telling us to Kiss Our Ass Goodbye!
Place head between legs...Kiss Ass Goodbye!
Aren't we getting tired of Commanders who come out in public to Contradict the Commander in Chief? What this Fey Coward Yellow Turncoat Press'Ho Antwerp is saying here is NOT what the President said in his brief Tinkle-stop Tour of New Orleans.
This mannequin is surrendering in the face of his mission and his country and frankly I am ashamed. Most of what the Corps does leaves me angry, but this leaves me ashamed and somewhat worried about the testicular fortitude of our Military Leaders.
This scoundrel needs to be stripped of every button on his uniform. We don't need Commanders with such weak knees.
No comments:
Post a Comment